#1
#1 out of 1
entertainment16h ago
WWE’s approach to WarGames needs a hard look after Survivor Series missteps
- WWE faces criticism that its WarGames strategy overemphasizes star power over cohesive teams and clear storytelling.
- Analysts note last year’s deal between Punk and Reigns contrasted with this year’s smaller beat approach.
- Historical comparisons highlight stronger WarGames when the faction narrative drives the match.
- The Survivor Series event at Petco Park in San Diego served as the focal point for the critique.
- WWE’s current approach is seen as a misstep rather than an evolution of the WarGames concept.
- Analysts call for a tighter build and consequences to strengthen WarGames narratives.
- The critique references past WarGames success, including the Bloodline storyline and Sami Zayn’s place.
- The article notes Seth Rollins’ absence contributed to a ‘mishmash’ version of the concept this year.
- Analysts advocate for stronger long-term storytelling to justify WarGames stakes.
- The piece emphasizes comparing WarGames execution with traditional WarGames-era storytelling.
Vote 0