8legs: Supreme court ruling

Your Followed Topics

#1 out of 3

Trump pledges to raise tariffs to 15% after Supreme Court ruling, signaling a major economic policy shift.
Ukraine strikes a key Russian industrial site as it continues its defense against the invasion.
Israeli strikes in eastern Lebanon kill Hezbollah members, raising regional tensions.
Spanish police arrest three men suspected of shipping dried opium poppy by mail.
Homeland security developments and border security topics feature prominently in the day’s news.
New developments include ongoing coverage of political and military events shaping global markets.
The day’s brief highlights also mention blizzards, protests, and other evolving events around the world.
The AP News package includes updates on U.S. immigration, weather, and education topics.
The day’s reporting also highlights energy policy and market responses to tariff changes.
The brief emphasizes the ongoing war in Ukraine and regional security dynamics in the Middle East.

Vote 0

#2 out of 3562.0 est. views

The Supreme Court ruled the president lacked authority to impose sweeping tariffs under IEEPA, restricting emergency powers.
Justice Clarence Thomas wrote a dissent calling the Court’s interpretation a misread of the statute and separation of powers.
Thomas argued Congress did not clearly authorize the executive to impose duties on imports under IEEPA.
The majority concluded Congress did not clearly transfer tariff powers to the executive under IEEPA.
Thomas cited historical tests like Nixon’s 1971 import surcharge to argue about import regulation scope.
President Trump had framed tariffs as part of his broader economic strategy during the dispute.
The Court’s ruling said the president cannot rely on IEEPA to impose unlimited tariffs after emergencies.
The ruling is a major test of executive power in trade policy and its limits.
The decision followed intensive media coverage of the administration’s tariff strategy.

Vote 0

#3 out of 3562.0 est. views

Newsom criticized Trump after the Supreme Court ruled the tariffs were beyond the president’s emergency power, calling his response into question.
Trump had threatened to raise tariffs from 10% to 15% on global imports after the ruling.
Newsom said the tariffs were always an illegal act and urged refund with interest.
Newsom criticized Trump’s overall economic approach as harmful to the U.S. economy.
Newsom linked Trump and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent to a 1994 film to emphasize his point.
The ruling and responses occurred amid ongoing coverage of Trump’s tariff policy and its economy impact.
The piece references related coverage about Trump, Newsom, tariffs and the Supreme Court.
The report notes Newsom’s critique came after the Supreme Court ruling on tariffs.
The article is part of HuffPost Politics coverage with branding and reader engagement sections.

Vote 0

Unlimited Access

Personalized Feed

Full Experience

By continuing, you agree to the Privacy Policy.. You also agree to receive our newsletters, you can opt-out any time.

Create an account and enjoy content that interests you with your personalized feed

Unlimited Access

Personalized Feed

Full Experience

By continuing, you agree to the Privacy Policy.. You also agree to receive our newsletters, you can opt-out any time.