Your Followed Topics

Top 18 supreme court of the united states News Today

#1
Supreme Court allows Trump to enforce passport restrictions targeting transgender people
#1 out of 182.9M est. views4.28%
politics9h ago

Supreme Court allows Trump to enforce passport restrictions targeting transgender people

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/supreme-court-allows-trump-enforce-passport-restrictions-targeting-tra-rcna235999https://www.cbsnews.com/news/supreme-court-trump-administration-new-passport-policy-x-marker/https://www.cnn.com/2025/11/06/politics/supreme-court-passport-sex-markers-transgender
Nbcnews.com and 8 more
  • The Supreme Court granted the Trump administration’s emergency request to enforce its policy barring transgender and nonbinary people from updating their sex markers on passports.
  • Lower courts blocked the policy earlier, allowing many transgender and nonbinary applicants to obtain passports aligned with their gender identity.
  • The policy targets transgender and nonbinary individuals’ ability to update passport sex designations, a change described as discriminatory by LGBTQ+ advocates.
Vote 48
0
#2
SCOTUS Justices Deliver Brutal Takedown of Trump’s Most Beloved Policy
#2 out of 1847.2K est. views
politics1d ago

SCOTUS Justices Deliver Brutal Takedown of Trump’s Most Beloved Policy

https://www.thedailybeast.com/scotus-pokes-holes-in-trumps-strongman-bully-taxes/
Thedailybeast.com
  • SCOTUS questions whether the president can use emergency powers to impose broad tariffs under IEEPA, signaling potential limits on presidential tariff authority.
  • Justices pressed whether Congress delegated tariff authority, warning of a potential one-way ratchet toward executive power.
  • The government argues tariffs reduce deficits and spur manufacturing, citing IEEPA as the basis for presidential action.
  • Opponents contend tariffs are taxes and violate Congress’s exclusive taxing power.
  • The court’s questioning reflected concerns about the central questions doctrine and statutory limits on tariff authority.
  • The case involves more than 100 countries and the use of emergency powers to impose tariffs on imports.
  • Small businesses and states joined challenges, arguing the tariffs overstep legislative authority.
  • The administration suggested there are other tariff authorities if the court rules against the president.
  • The arguments included testimony from Neil Katyal on behalf of challengers, emphasizing Congress’s taxing role.
Vote 0
0
#3
Odds of Trump Winning Key SCOTUS Case Tank After Terrible Start
#3 out of 1862.9K est. views
politics3h ago

Odds of Trump Winning Key SCOTUS Case Tank After Terrible Start

https://www.thedailybeast.com/odds-of-donald-trump-winning-tariffs-case-before-supreme-court-tank-after-terrible-start/
Thedailybeast.com
  • The Supreme Court heard arguments on tariffs and presidential power, with Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Barrett signaling skepticism.
  • Online betting markets showed Trump’s odds dropping significantly after the arguments.
  • The administration argues tariffs are valid under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.
  • Two lower courts previously ruled the president lacked authority to bypass Congress on tariffs.
  • Justices asked whether the central questions doctrine applied to tariff authority.
  • The White House warned the country could face ‘Third World status’ without tariffs.
  • A back-up plan was reportedly in preparation if the tariffs were struck down.
  • The case centers on whether the president can impose tariffs without Congress’s explicit authorization.
  • The article notes the ongoing effect of tariffs during appeals.
Vote 0
0
#4
After judges are critical of the Supreme Court, Jim Jordan asks the wrong question
#4 out of 18
politics9h ago

After judges are critical of the Supreme Court, Jim Jordan asks the wrong question

https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/judges-are-critical-supreme-court-jim-jordan-asks-wrong-question-rcna242429
Msnbc.com
  • Latest development: Federal judges criticized the Supreme Court's opaque emergency orders and shadow docket handling.
  • The article says the focus should be on the high court’s controversial conduct, not lower-court complaints.
  • Reporters from NBC News and The New York Times documented judges’ concerns about the shadow docket eroding public trust.
  • The piece notes the criticism came from judges appointed by both Democratic and Republican presidents.
  • The article highlights that the shadow docket faced scrutiny as courts overturned rulings related to the White House.
  • The narrative connects the criticism to concerns about the court’s public image and guidance for proceeding.
  • Republican chairmen urged Roberts to investigate ethics, but the article argues it misses the point.
  • The report frames the issue as higher court conduct affecting the judiciary more than lower-court critiques.
  • The piece anchors its claims to contemporaneous reporting from NBC News and The New York Times.
  • The analysis links the controversy to how emergency orders affect perceptions of the judiciary.
Vote 0
0
#5
Expert predicts 'easy way' Supreme Court will shut down Trump's main priority
#5 out of 181.1K est. views
politics15h ago

Expert predicts 'easy way' Supreme Court will shut down Trump's main priority

https://www.rawstory.com/trump-tariffs-2674270672/
Rawstory.com
  • A law expert says the Supreme Court could strike down tariffs by focusing on plain statutory language.
  • The expert notes an easier, less political route exists to rule against the tariffs.
  • Justice Barrett could be pivotal by prioritizing plain language over broad statutory interpretations.
  • The discussion centers on what regulation of importation means under current statutes.
  • Experts argue the emergency label may not be essential if statutory language suffices.
  • The article frames the issue as a potential strategic legal workaround with broad implications.
  • The piece situates the debate within the broader context of presidential tariff powers.
  • The report cites MSNBC discussions as part of the expert’s reasoning.
  • The discussion references the legal standard for deference to presidential action.
  • The overall takeaway is a potential, simpler route to resolve tariff disputes without full emergency arguments.
Vote 0
0
#6
The Three Months That Could Make Trump King
#6 out of 18562.0 est. views
politics18h ago

The Three Months That Could Make Trump King

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/supreme-court-john-roberts-donald-trump.html
Nymag.com
  • The Supreme Court could significantly shape presidential power in the next three months, impacting how the president governs.
  • Chief Justice Roberts’ immunity rulings are cited as potentially expanding presidential control over law enforcement and agencies.
  • Upcoming tariffs cases ask who gets to impose tariffs and whether such moves are subject to major questions review by courts.
  • The piece notes Roberts’ approach could let the president deploy powers without robust judicial check, depending on future rulings.
  • The article argues that Roberts’ opinions could undermine Congressional and judicial checks on the executive branch.
  • The piece discusses how National Guard deployment and “unreviewable discretion” arguments are central to the court battles.
  • The analysis highlights potential long-term shifts if courts tolerate executive dominance, including in monetary and regulatory spheres.
  • The article cites Justice Sonia Sotomayor’s warning that the president is turning into ‘a king above the law’ in some readings of the cases.
  • The piece anticipates hearings on the independence of major agencies and possible impacts on regulatory regimes.
  • The article emphasizes the risk that executive power could escalate if the reach of presidential decisions broadens without countervailing safeguards.
  • Overall, the analysis treats Roberts’ evolving jurisprudence as a potential blueprint for future presidential authority.
Vote 0
0
#7
Trump’s Top Goons Watch His Lawyers Get Flattened at SCOTUS
#7 out of 18231.5K est. views
politics19h ago

Trump’s Top Goons Watch His Lawyers Get Flattened at SCOTUS

https://www.thedailybeast.com/trumps-top-goons-watch-his-lawyers-get-flattened-at-scotus/
Thedailybeast.com
  • SCOTUS hearing examined if Trump could use emergency powers to set tariffs under IEEPA, with justices questioning the authority.
  • Justice Gorsuch pressed Sauer on separation of powers and whether Congress, not the president, authorizes tariff authority.
  • Chief Justice Roberts called tariffs a form of taxation and questioned the president’s authority under a law never used for that purpose.
  • Justice Barrett and other justices showed skepticism about the administration’s arguments during the hearing.
  • The White House reportedly prepared Plan B options in case the decision did not go their way.
  • The hearing lasted nearly three hours as justices questioned the legality of Trump’s tariffs.
  • Justice Kagan referenced Trump’s declaration of emergencies while commenting on broader emergency powers.
  • The hearing featured notable attendees, including Republican and Democratic lawmakers in the public gallery.
  • Trump’s allies reportedly watched as the court’s conservatives considered the case’s reach on presidential tariffs.
  • The proceedings followed coverage by major outlets including The Daily Beast, The New York Times, and Reuters.
Vote 1
0
#8
Amy Coney Barrett Hints at Private Panic Over Massive Trump Tax Refunds
#8 out of 18474.7K est. views
politics19h ago

Amy Coney Barrett Hints at Private Panic Over Massive Trump Tax Refunds

https://www.thedailybeast.com/amy-coney-barrett-hints-at-private-panic-over-massive-trump-tax-refunds/
Thedailybeast.com
  • Barrett suggested it would be a 'mess' if the Trump tariffs are ruled illegal and refunds are due.
  • The hearing examined whether the president overstepped authority under the IEEPA to impose global tariffs.
  • Barrett questioned how a reimbursement process would work if refunds are required.
  • Small businesses contested that refunds should be issued if the administration loses the case.
  • Justices showed skepticism about the legal basis for the tariffs during the two-hour hearing.
  • President Trump defended the tariffs, calling the case potentially one of the most important in U.S. history.
  • The government has collected almost $90 billion in tariffs under scrutiny.
  • The briefing notes indicate refunds could be possible if the court rules against the administration.
  • The hearing addressed whether Congress was bypassed in imposing tariffs.
  • The Daily Beast reported on the tense exchange between Barrett and Katyal during the session.
Vote 1
0
#9
Conservative Supreme Court justices appear skeptical of Trump’s sweeping tariffs, AP Explains
#9 out of 183.4K est. views
politics23h ago

Conservative Supreme Court justices appear skeptical of Trump’s sweeping tariffs, AP Explains

https://apnews.com/video/conservative-supreme-court-justices-appear-skeptical-of-trumps-sweeping-tariffs-ap-explains-8884806cdcf44c8ab4f1c59b4e5bb929
Apnews.com
  • Supreme Court justices, mostly conservative, questioned the breadth of Trump administration tariffs during a recent discussion.
  • The AP Explains piece outlines potential economic and constitutional implications of broad tariff powers.
  • The analysis notes potential limits under current law and judicial precedent on tariff power.
  • The segment frames the debate within the ongoing tension between executive actions and legislative authority on tariffs.
  • No final ruling is cited; the discussion centers on the questions raised during the Court's inquiry.
  • AP Explains provides context on how tariffs could affect industries and consumer prices.
  • The piece emphasizes that the legality of sweeping tariffs remains a debated issue.
  • The discussion aired in the AP News video framework, linking journalism to legal analysis.
  • The article discusses the potential trade and policy consequences of tariff use by the administration.
  • The analysis notes the intersection of law, policy, and court scrutiny in tariff decisions.
Vote 0
0
#10
AZ AG reacts to Trump's tariffs: 'We fought a Revolutionary War over this issue'
#10 out of 18
politics1d ago

AZ AG reacts to Trump's tariffs: 'We fought a Revolutionary War over this issue'

https://www.msnbc.com/katy-tur/watch/az-ag-reacts-to-trump-s-tariffs-we-fought-a-revolutionary-war-over-this-issue-251408965794
Msnbc.com
  • Arizona and Oregon AGs lead a lawsuit challenging President Trump's tariffs, arguing overreach of executive authority.
  • The case centers on whether the president can impose tariffs, a topic tied to constitutional limits and federal power.
  • Katy Tur reports comments from the Arizona and Oregon attorneys general on the Supreme Court hearing.
  • The tariffs are framed as a vital policy issue with historical reference to protectionist debates.
  • The segment features political analysis on why voters may be skeptical of tariff-driven approaches.
  • The news segment includes a variety of related political highlights and future election context.
  • The discussion occurs in the context of a broader national debate on tariffs and economic policy.
  • The piece notes the involvement of multiple states, highlighting a coordinated legal challenge.
  • Katy Tur anchors the segment, guiding viewers through the tariffs discussion and legal implications.
  • The reference links to related MSNBC content and highlights about elections and policy.
Vote 0
0

Log in to continue reading

Unlimited Access
Personalized Feed
Full Experience

By continuing, you agree to the Privacy Policy.

Explore Your Interests

Create an account and enjoy content that interests you with your personalized feed

Unlimited Access
Personalized Feed
Full Experience
By continuing, you agree to the Privacy Policy.. You also agree to receive our newsletters, you can opt-out any time.

Advertisement

Advertisement