8legs: Paul l. friedman

#1 out of 1

Federal judge skeptical of Pentagon rules for reporters, saying 'asking a question is not criminal'

U.S. District Judge Paul Friedman questioned the Pentagon policy restricting reporters from asking information not approved by officials.
court heard arguments from The New York Times and the Pentagon Press Association seeking reinstatement for about 300 journalists.
Justice Department argued the policy protects national security, but Friedman pressed for public access to information.
The judge noted, 'Asking a question is not criminal,' underscoring a key First Amendment concern.
The case centers on whether roughly 300 journalists may keep Pentagon credentials despite the new agreement.
The court emphasized the public’s right to know what government leaders are doing.
The proceedings referenced historical tensions around Pentagon disclosures and national security.
Ted Butros argued for The New York Times that journalists should be considered 'persona non grata' at the Pentagon if policy stands.
The judge promised to move quickly toward a decision on the policy dispute.
The case highlights a broader debate over balancing transparency with security during wartime.

Vote 0