Your Followed Topics

Top 1 oak ridge national laboratory News Today

#1
MIT study finds AI can already replace 11.7% of U.S. workforce
#1 out of 14.3M est. views0.00%
technology22h ago

MIT study finds AI can already replace 11.7% of U.S. workforce

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/11/26/mit-study-finds-ai-can-already-replace-11point7percent-of-us-workforce.htmlhttps://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/artificial-intelligence/mit-simulation-shows-ai-can-replace-11-7-percent-of-u-s-workers-worth-usd1-2-trillion-in-salaries-iceberg-index-tool-shows-jobs-are-affected-in-every-state-across-the-countryhttps://www.techradar.com/pro/mit-study-claims-ai-could-currently-replace-12-percent-of-total-us-jobs-market
Cnbc.com and 2 more
  • AI could currently affect roughly 12% of the U.S. jobs market, with implications spanning multiple sectors beyond tech.
  • The Iceberg Index tracks 151 million workers, 923 occupations, and 32,000+ skills to map automation risk across 3,000 counties.
  • Automation risk is widespread, with human resources, logistics, finance, and administration among the most vulnerable beyond traditional tech roles.
  • Policy design and training are pivotal; government planning can mitigate displacement by guiding upskilling and infrastructure investments.
  • The Iceberg Index helps forecast AI’s effects before they materialize, enabling targeted local planning with county-level detail (about 3,000 counties).
  • New reference data from TechRadar underscores that MIT’s findings are being framed as actionable intelligence for policy and workforce readiness.
  • Visible vs. hidden effects: MIT’s framework distinguishes direct job losses from broader shifts in task demands and organization.
  • Regional variance exists: some states show higher hidden exposure to automation, highlighting the need for tailored training in those areas.
  • The study situates AI-driven disruption within broader automation debates, linking productivity gains to shifts in labor demand.
  • Policy relevance at the state level is demonstrated by how Iceberg-informed plans could reduce taxpayer waste through proactive training and policy testing.
Vote 30
0

Explore Your Interests

Unlimited Access
Personalized Feed
Full Experience
or
By continuing, you agree to the Privacy Policy.. You also agree to receive our newsletters, you can opt-out any time.

Explore Your Interests

Create an account and enjoy content that interests you with your personalized feed

Unlimited Access
Personalized Feed
Full Experience
or
By continuing, you agree to the Privacy Policy.. You also agree to receive our newsletters, you can opt-out any time.

Advertisement

Advertisement