8legs: Mel curth

Your Followed Topics

#1 out of 295.59%

Latest development: Fulnecky’s F grade sparked a university review and instructor leave amid campus backlash.
Fulnecky argued that the essay reflected religious beliefs and was not judged on empirical evidence, prompting discrimination claims.
The instructor, Mel Curth, faced scrutiny for deeming the paper offensive and not addressing the assignment prompt, per university statements.
OU officials said the final course grade would not be affected by the failing statement in the essay, as the review progressed.
Backlash included remarks from Turning Point USA and widespread social media attention over religious freedom in academia.
The university emphasized fairness and First Amendment rights while seeking a balanced review of beliefs and academic standards.
Fulnecky argued that the assignment did not require personal ideology and should reflect critical engagement with the article used in class.
Other course instructors reportedly supported the instructor's grading approach, citing rubric expectations and academic standards.
OU administration began an investigation into the claims, with statements emphasizing student rights and fair treatment.
The controversy drew national attention with coverage from other outlets and social media debates about religious belief in education.

Vote 1

#2 out of 2402.8K est. views

The University of Oklahoma placed a psychology professor on administrative leave amid a grade dispute tied to a student essay on gender.
Samantha Fulnecky received a zero after writing an essay about what the Bible says about traditional gender roles without citing sources.
The university said it started a grade appeals process to ensure Fulnecky would suffer no academic harm before reviewing possible discrimination claims.
Supporters linked the case to broader debates over cancel culture and religious freedoms in classrooms.
Fulnecky and allies argued the case reflects religious persecution claims, sparking conservative media involvement.
University officials emphasized that First Amendment concerns do not apply to a non-government entity's grading decisions.
The university said a full-time instructor would lead the course while the grade review proceeds.
The incident drew coverage from right-leaning outlets and online commentators criticizing perceived bias in academia.
The case centers on whether a professor can grade a student’s work based on adherence to empirical sources versus personal belief.
The university stated it would review Fulnecky's claim of illegal discrimination, amid broader debate over academic standards and religious expression.

Vote 1

Unlimited Access

Personalized Feed

Full Experience

By continuing, you agree to the Privacy Policy.. You also agree to receive our newsletters, you can opt-out any time.

Create an account and enjoy content that interests you with your personalized feed

Unlimited Access

Personalized Feed

Full Experience

By continuing, you agree to the Privacy Policy.. You also agree to receive our newsletters, you can opt-out any time.