8legs: Markwayne mullin

Your Followed Topics

#1 out of 3

Mullin faces questions on whether supporting strikes equates to regime change during a CNN interview.
Collins presses Mullin to clarify if removing the regime would be the goal of U.S. action.
Mullin insists the strikes are to stop the regime from killing its own people, not to remove it.
Collins notes Iran's crackdown on protests and communications blackout as context for the debate.
President Trump warned of a 'very strong response' if Iran harms protesters, framing the broader tension.
The discussion centers on whether U.S. actions constitute regime change amid Iranian protests.
Mullin claims support for removing the regime only if it stops killing its own people.
The exchange underscores U.S. policymakers' struggle with defining regime change versus armed action.
Raw Story frames Mullin’s stance in the wider context of Iranian protests and international reaction.
The segment includes multimedia and social media context around Collins’ question.

Vote 0

#2 out of 3121.3K est. views

Mullin is pressed on Iran policy during a CNN interview, with focus on Trump’s Iran stance.
He later clarifies that he does not seek regime change, distinguishing strikes from regime change.
Mullin labels Iran’s leadership as dangerous, amid broader debate on U.S. options.
Trump’s post and the Iran protests intensify the political debate on U.S. strategy.
The CNN interview occurred as Tehran protests and casualties drew international attention.
Mullin’s remarks were made during a broader discussion of U.S. involvement in Iran.
Mullin’s later remarks aimed to separate military action from political outcomes in Iran.
The Daily Beast sought comment from Mullin on the interview.
The article features images from Tehran and notes high casualty figures.
The piece situates Iran-U.S. tensions amid ongoing protests and international rhetoric.
The article lists multiple trending topics tied to Trump allies and immigration policy.

Vote 1

#3 out of 311.8K est. views

world4h ago

Mullin says he would support removing the regime if it is killing its own people, during a CNN interview.
He differentiates between strikes and regime change, saying the latter is up to the Iranian people.
Mullin claims the U.S. is not actively seeking regime change in Iran, despite acknowledging strikes.
Collins presses Mullin on whether his comments amount to regime change, prompting clarification.
The discussion cites historical U.S. involvement in Iran, including the 1953 overthrow of Mosaddegh.
Protests in Iran have continued, with activists reporting thousands killed by security forces.
Mullin asserts Iran’s leadership will face consequences if it harms protesters, a comment tied to U.S. strategy.
The interview underscores media scrutiny of U.S. policy toward Iran amid protests.
The piece emphasizes that debates about regime change continue to shape GOP commentary on Iran.
The report frames Mullin's stance within a broader context of U.S. strategic options in the Middle East.

Vote 0

Unlimited Access

Personalized Feed

Full Experience

By continuing, you agree to the Privacy Policy.. You also agree to receive our newsletters, you can opt-out any time.

Create an account and enjoy content that interests you with your personalized feed

Unlimited Access

Personalized Feed

Full Experience

By continuing, you agree to the Privacy Policy.. You also agree to receive our newsletters, you can opt-out any time.