#1
#1 out of 2
sports13h ago
Analysis: NBA’s 65-game rule was a bandage for a symptom that never addressed the root issue
- The NBA’s 65-game rule aims to curb load management but may not fix the root causes of injuries or the long season.
- Experts say the season’s length and pace drive more injuries, not just players resting for awards eligibility.
- The author cites coaches and players who say the intent of the rule is good but its impact is questionable.
- The piece argues the rule doesn’t address the root issue of why players miss games—rest and injury risk linked to season length and pace.
- Key players at risk of MVP or award eligibility under the rule include Jokic, Gilgeous-Alexander, and Wembanyama.
- The author calls for addressing the season length as the real fix, not just policing awards eligibility.
- The article quotes team figures who acknowledge the rule’s intent but question its success.
- The discussion links load management to broader debates about the NBA’s health and entertainment value.
- The piece notes commentators see the rule as a bandage masking a longer-standing league issue.
Vote 0
