#1 out of 1
sports5h ago
College football fans split on concept of fixed site for national championship
- Fans are split on whether the CFP title game should have a fixed site, with several options discussed publicly.
- Some supporters argue a Rose Bowl permanent site could alleviate ticket shortages and congestion.
- Others point to New Orleans as a feasible alternative with historic venues hosting future natty games.
- Some fans advocate higher seeds hosting playoff games to create a home‑field atmosphere for the natty.
- There is skepticism about rotating sites and potential regional drawbacks for fans attending live games.
- Some voices emphasize the calendar and scheduling implications if a fixed site were adopted.
- Public commentary includes opinions about balancing travel, weather, and stadium capacity concerns.
- There is debate about whether a fixed site would benefit fans or simply corporate interests.
- Commentators and fans alike have debated venue pros and cons, citing traffic, location, and fan accessibility as key factors.
- Overall, the discussion highlights a broader question of how to maintain excitement while improving accessibility for a growing CFP landscape.
Vote 0
