Your Followed Topics

Top 4 jia cobb News Today

#1
A federal judge temporarily blocks Trump's troop deployment in D.C.
#1 out of 41.6M est. views0.00%
politics6h ago

A federal judge temporarily blocks Trump's troop deployment in D.C.

https://www.npr.org/2025/11/20/nx-s1-5615399/dc-troops-deployment-blocked-trumphttps://www.cnn.com/2025/11/20/politics/national-guard-washington-dc-trump-rulinghttps://www.fox5dc.com/news/judge-rules-national-guard-deployment-dc-illegal
Npr.org and 8 more
  • A federal judge ordered the Trump administration to end its National Guard deployment in Washington, D.C., ruling it illegally intrudes on local authority and policing decisions.
  • The ruling reinforces that the president cannot unilaterally deploy D.C. National Guard for crime control without local consent, protecting local sovereignty.
  • D.C. Attorney General Brian Schwalb argues the deployment violates civil rights and undermines local autonomy by normalizing military policing in domestic law enforcement.
Vote 42
0
#2
US judge orders end to Trump’s deployment of troops in Washington, DC
#2 out of 4
politics49m ago

US judge orders end to Trump’s deployment of troops in Washington, DC

  • A federal judge temporarily paused the Trump administration's deployment of National Guard troops to Washington, DC.
  • Judge Jia Cobb gave the administration 21 days to appeal the order before it goes into effect.
  • The ruling follows a lawsuit by Washington, DC officials alleging overreach of policing powers.
  • The deployment has included soldiers from multiple states and federal agents in several cities.
  • Civil liberties groups report rights violations and racial profiling during crackdowns.
  • The court noted the federal government's unique powers in Washington, DC, but questioned the scope of deployment.
  • The judge’s decision requires the 21-day window before the order becomes effective.
  • The government argues the lawsuit lacks merit, calling it a frivolous stunt.
  • The case centers on whether deploying troops infringes on local policing authority.
  • The administration has cited crime and immigration concerns behind the deployments.
Vote 0
0
#3
Thursday’s Mini-Report, 11.20.25
#3 out of 4100.00%
politics2h ago

Thursday’s Mini-Report, 11.20.25

  • A federal judge ordered the end of the National Guard deployment to Washington, D.C., ruling it illegally intrudes on local authorities.
  • The court paused the order for 21 days to allow for an appeal.
  • The ruling underscores tensions over federal security actions in the capital city.
  • The decision arises amid broader debate about federal versus local control of policing in D.C.
  • This development is linked to ongoing scrutiny of the Trump administration’s actions in Washington.
  • The order affects how federal and local authorities coordinate security in the capital.
  • The case informs ongoing legal debates over presidential authority and local governance in D.C.
  • The narrative centers on the legality of federal military deployment inside a U.S. district.
  • The judge’s 21-day pause creates a window for appeals and further judicial review.
  • The briefing includes coverage of other political issues, including offshore drilling and transparency concerns.
Vote 0
0
#4
Judge calls Trump administration’s National Guard deployment in D.C. illegal
#4 out of 4100.00%
politics2h ago

Judge calls Trump administration’s National Guard deployment in D.C. illegal

  • A federal judge ruled the Trump administration’s DC National Guard deployment illegal, marking a key limit on executive power.
  • Judge Jia Cobb said the federal government exceeded its authority by deploying troops without the mayor’s consent.
  • The ruling will take effect after December 11 to allow for appeal proceedings.
  • DC officials argued the deployment violated the Home Rule Act, which preserves local control over DC affairs.
  • The case centers on whether federal troops can be deployed for domestic law enforcement without local consent.
  • White House spokesperson defended the deployment as within authority to protect federal assets.
  • The lawsuit was filed by the District of Columbia after the deployment to address alleged overreach.
  • The case has parallels with recent actions in Chicago, Los Angeles, and Portland amid similar court battles.
  • The dispute highlights ongoing tensions between federal authority and local governance over security policy.
Vote 0
0

Explore Your Interests

Unlimited Access
Personalized Feed
Full Experience
or
By continuing, you agree to the Privacy Policy.. You also agree to receive our newsletters, you can opt-out any time.

Explore Your Interests

Create an account and enjoy content that interests you with your personalized feed

Unlimited Access
Personalized Feed
Full Experience
or
By continuing, you agree to the Privacy Policy.. You also agree to receive our newsletters, you can opt-out any time.

Advertisement

Advertisement