8legs: Jerome h. powell

Your Followed Topics

#1 out of 3

A federal judge quashed two subpoenas to the Federal Reserve tied to Powell case, marking a legal setback for Trump.
Judge James Boasberg ruled the subpoenas were improper and aimed to harass Powell rather than show crimes.
Pirro, a Trump ally, led the probe into Powell’s testimony and Fed building renovations.
Powell said the investigation aimed to pressure the Fed to cut rates and threaten its independence.
The ruling caps an aggressive push by Pirro against Powell amid ongoing debates over Fed independence.
Powell commented that punitive actions would hinder independent monetary policy.
Trump had criticized Powell for not cutting rates sharply and floated removing him.
The DOJ had sought Powell-related records tied to a Fed building project overhaul.
The court decision was unsealed on March 13, 2026, in a case linked to Pirro’s probe.
The article notes Trump publicly criticized the Fed chair on Truth Social.

Vote 0

#2 out of 3

A federal judge in DC quashed the grand jury subpoenas aimed at Jerome Powell, delivering a blow to the DOJ’s Powell probe.
Judge Boasberg said the government offered little evidence of crime, calling the case thin and pretextual.
The ruling casts doubt on whether the probe into Powell can proceed, at least in its current form.
Pirro had signed off on investigating Powell in November 2025, according to court filings and sources.
Powell’s lawyers contested the subpoenas as part of the DOJ’s renovation probe into the Fed’s headquarters.
Trump publicly criticized Powell but had previously urged action against political opponents seen as challenging him.
The DC U.S. Attorney’s Office opened the probe, with Jeanine Pirro overseeing the matter.
Powell faced scrutiny over the Fed’s headquarters renovation amid questions about policy independence.
The judge emphasized a lack of corroborating evidence and treated the subpoenas as potentially pressure tactics.
Powell’s case drew reaction from White House and lawmakers, signaling ongoing political tensions.

Vote 0

#3 out of 3189.3K est. views

A federal judge tossed subpoenas aimed at the Federal Reserve Board in a probe involving Fed Chair Jerome Powell.
The judge said the subpoenas were served for an improper purpose and found little evidence of crime by Powell.
The ruling indicates the investigation may be pretextual, with the court calling the government’s justifications thin.
U.S. Attorney Pirro said the DOJ would appeal the decision.
The subpoenas targeted records on renovations of the Fed’s Washington, D.C., buildings and Powell’s testimony.
Powell’s term is up in May, with Warsh’s nomination under consideration by the Senate.
The ruling notes past statements from Trump criticizing Powell as part of the broader context.
The case has influenced ongoing discussions about Powell’s replacement and regulatory independence.
The article emphasizes the balance between political pressure and legal standards in federal probes.
The decision narrows the DOJ investigation while leaving open avenues for appeal.

Vote 1

Unlimited Access

Personalized Feed

Full Experience

By continuing, you agree to the Privacy Policy.. You also agree to receive our newsletters, you can opt-out any time.

Create an account and enjoy content that interests you with your personalized feed

Unlimited Access

Personalized Feed

Full Experience

By continuing, you agree to the Privacy Policy.. You also agree to receive our newsletters, you can opt-out any time.