#1 out of 19
world24m ago
Inside Trump’s Iran warning — and the unexpected pause that followed
- Trump warned Iran and protesters of U.S. action on Jan. 13, signaling potential military moves.
- By Jan. 15, the pause in strikes had become central to Washington's Iran policy discussions.
- Officials cited caution and the risk of retaliation as factors behind delaying any strike.
- Analysts warned that intervention could backfire on the Iranian protest movement and complicate aims.
- Some experts argued restraint might preserve credibility, though others feared diminished U.S. leverage.
- The discussions occurred as a carrier headed toward the Gulf, indicating ongoing military pressure options.
- Trump publicly questioned a potential Iranian successor, signaling strategic considerations about leadership post-crisis.
- Some experts warned that overt involvement could simplify the regime’s narrative for suppressing protests.
- Experts discussed kinetic, covert, and cyber options, stressing the need for a clear endgame.
- The broader debate centered on how far U.S. pressure should go without undermining protesters or regional stability.
Vote 0









