8legs: Insurance

Your Followed Topics

#1 out of 2

David Parker is highlighted as a leading California attorney in ethics and professional liability.
The profile notes Parker served as lead trial counsel in the Viner v. Sweet case establishing but-for causation for malpractice.
A recent win for HUB International is cited as proof of Parker’s defense-oriented litigation impact.
Parker’s community service includes board secretary duties for the Scleroderma Foundation.
The profile mentions Parker’s leadership in ethics committees within the Los Angeles legal community.
Parker’s career spans five decades with a focus on high-stakes business litigation.
The piece positions Parker as a trusted advisor to the legal community.
The LATimes profile places Parker within California’s broader legal and civil rights context.
The article lists Parker’s other professional roles and ongoing litigation work.

Vote 0

#2 out of 2

health10h ago

Medicare has blocked new home health and hospice providers for at least six months, a move critics say aims to curb fraud but may restrict access.
The article argues the ban could hinder access to care in rural and underserved communities where current firms lack competition.
Critics say preventing new entrants may protect existing firms while failing to address actual fraud among current providers.
The analysis notes the Government Accountability Office estimated about $100 billion in improper payments in 2023, a fraction of nearly $1 trillion in total program spending.
The piece questions the shutdown of new entrants as a solution, suggesting stronger enforcement against existing bad actors instead.
Hospice payment mechanics are identified as a core issue, with fixed daily rates potentially misaligning incentives over time.
The author suggests boosting ownership transparency and preventing reuse of names by convicted operators as a potential fix.
Some providers exist that operate on private pay only and do not participate in government programs.
The piece notes CMS chair Mehmet Oz’s statements about blocking new entrants as a broader anti-fraud effort.
The article contrasts the ban with the need to physically limit the access to care and ensure supply in underserved areas.

Vote 0

Unlimited Access

Personalized Feed

Full Experience

By continuing, you agree to the Privacy Policy.. You also agree to receive our newsletters, you can opt-out any time.

Create an account and enjoy content that interests you with your personalized feed

Unlimited Access

Personalized Feed

Full Experience

By continuing, you agree to the Privacy Policy.. You also agree to receive our newsletters, you can opt-out any time.