#1 out of 498.91%
politics1h ago
So long, hereditary peers – but the Lords is still full of absurd anachronisms | Polly Toynbee
- Hereditary peers were voted out, signaling a shift but not a constitutional overhaul.
- Toynbee says reforms fail to address deeper rule-of-law concerns and the Lords’ legitimacy.
- The piece calls for a commission or a democratically elected second chamber.
- Donor influence and donations in the Lords are highlighted as part of the reform debate.
- The Lords could still obstruct government business via its own rules and procedures.
- There is debate over retaining bishops and hereditary peers after reforms.
- The piece connects Lords reform to Brexit and broader constitutional questions.
- Toynbee notes public support for a democratically elected second chamber.
- The article suggests preserving useful figures while reforming the Lords’ size.
- The piece highlights the ongoing debate over the Salisbury Convention and constitutional norms.
- The article closes by warning about capitalizing on reform without broad consensus.
Vote 0



