#1
#1 out of 332.0K est. views
entertainment1d ago
There are no winners this year, according to social media
- Fans accuse the HFPA of a weak stand-up field, suggesting the Golden Globes nominees reflect bias toward established names.
- Observers point to age bias, noting the HFPA did not nominate a comedian under 45.
- The article frames the debate as a broader critique of how stand-up is evaluated by awards bodies.
- Fans highlighted notable snubs such as Jerrod Carmichael and Gianmarco Soresi as missing from the nominations.
- The piece notes the historical context of the Golden Globes' stand-up category with only a few times awarded.
- The discussion frames the awards as having subjective judgments over what constitutes comedy excellence.
- The article emphasizes that the field has long been subject to controversy and debate among fans.
- The piece mentions that the Golden Globes added podcasting to categories, signaling shifts in stand-up evaluation.
- Overall, the article captures a sentiment that the stand-up nominations did not accurately reflect contemporary comedy.
- The report relies on quotes from readers and critics to illustrate the reaction to the nominations.
- The article identifies a broader debate about the representation of stand-up across age and novelty in awards.
Vote 0
