#1 out of 1
politics6h ago
Trump is contemplating the sheer folly of boots on the ground in Iran. How did it come to this? | Simon Tisdall
- Trump is portrayed as seriously considering US ground troops in Iran, risking a new Middle East war.
- The piece argues any ground attack could provoke escalation and high casualties despite short-term aims.
- Iran could respond with an asymmetric war, while allied regional powers show hesitation about backing a broader confrontation.
- The author notes Trump’s political vulnerability and reliance on others, including Netanyahu and Arab allies.
- The piece calls for unconditional negotiations as the sane path forward to avoid a catastrophe.
- The Guardian criticizes Netanyahu for not preventing further bombing and for not bailing Trump out.
- The article describes US and Iranian maximalist demands as widening the gap between sides.
- The author questions whether a land war could be sustainable for Trump politically.
- The opinion argues that the crisis requires diplomatic engagement rather than an expansive military campaign.
- The piece places accountability on Trump for the war-trajectory and calls it reckless and narcissistic.
Vote 0
