#1 out of 1
politics13h ago
Banning organisations has a sorry history – does Australia really want to go down this road again? | Anne Twomey
- The piece warns that past Australian bans on political groups were struck down by high court and harmed civil liberties.
- Twomey argues banning organisations is historically risky and could be abused without due process.
- The article recounts wartime bans, including the Industrial Workers of the World and the Communist Party, showing how power was used selectively.
- The author notes the 1950 Communist Party Dissolution Act was struck down as unconstitutional.
- The piece highlights procedural fairness concerns in ministerial declarations of hate groups.
- The essay questions whether current hate laws align with historical limits of executive power.
- Twomey emphasizes the risk that laws could be used to suppress civil rights without clear verdicts of guilt.
- Historical bans often targeted broader groups beyond those convicted of crimes.
- The article frames the debate as balancing national security against civil liberties.
- The author cautions Australians to consider constitutional limits before enacting new hate-group bans.
Vote 0
