8legs: Gianluca prestianni

Your Followed Topics

#1 out of 314.6K est. views0.00%

The UEFA body provisionally suspended Gianluca Prestianni for the next match as part of an ongoing disciplinary probe.
Prestianni denies directing racist insults and says he did not direct racist language toward Vinícius Júnior, expressing regret over threats directed at him.
Benfica said it will appeal UEFA's ruling but noted deadlines are unlikely to affect the second-leg schedule of the playoff.

Vote 23

#2 out of 3

Benfica faces global scrutiny after a racism allegation linked to Gianluca Prestianni and Vinicius Junior at a Lisbon match.
Benfica’s post-match defense framed the incident as possibly misheard, prompting backlash from fans and officials.
Mourinho’s remarks intensified debate, with several figures labeling his comments as inappropriate.
Club legends and FIFA leadership expressed shock at the episode, highlighting broader concerns about racism in football.
The incident prompted calls for accountability from club officials and fans alike.
Benfica’s broader handling of the episode raised questions about loyalty vs. responsibility in football clubs.
The article notes a broader pattern of reactions to racism across football in different clubs and countries.
The piece underscored how Benfica’s environment can feel siege-like amid controversy.
The report highlights that Benfica’s management faced an ongoing UEFA investigation related to the case.

Vote 0

#3 out of 3

Espn.com and 1 more

UEFA provisionally suspended Gianluca Prestianni for the next UEFA club competition match while the disciplinary process continues.
The investigation uses a prima facie standard of proof, which is a lower threshold than other evidentiary standards commonly used in sports disciplinary cases.
UEFA cited the match-up between Benfica and Real Madrid as part of an ongoing inquiry into discriminatory conduct during the knockout playoff on 17 February 2026.
Prestianni denies racist abuse allegations, while Vinícius Júnior is the accuser beyond the ongoing UEFA process.
If found guilty, the case could carry a ban of up to 10 matches under UEFA guidance on racist conduct.
Past UEFA actions have used prima facie findings to justify interim suspensions in cases of alleged racist conduct, echoing Kudela’s precedent.
The current case mirrors UEFA's regulatory language used in previous disciplinary actions against players linked to racist incidents.
UEFA notes that further information will be provided as the investigation and submissions progress, indicating an ongoing process.
The article explains the meaning of prima facie and its role in UEFA's standard of proof for disciplinary proceedings.
The referenced 2013 document 'European Football titled against racism' informs the minimum sanction framework for racist conduct at the UEFA level.

Vote 1

Unlimited Access

Personalized Feed

Full Experience

By continuing, you agree to the Privacy Policy.. You also agree to receive our newsletters, you can opt-out any time.

Create an account and enjoy content that interests you with your personalized feed

Unlimited Access

Personalized Feed

Full Experience

By continuing, you agree to the Privacy Policy.. You also agree to receive our newsletters, you can opt-out any time.