#1
#1 out of 1
politics4h ago
Archivist 'astounded' by DOJ's new 'assault on the nation's history' in service of Trump
- A National Archives lawyer and supporters condemn the DOJ opinion as an assault on the nation's history.
- The Office of Legal Counsel argued the Presidential Records Act is unconstitutional, drawing sharp pushback.
- Gary M. Stern, former NARA general counsel, calls the claim contrary to decades of practice and law.
- Stern says the act preserves the separation of powers and ensures records remain secure until presidency ends.
- Supporters argue Congress acted to prevent destruction of crucial records like Watergate tapes.
- Stern argues the act balances preservation with public accountability and archival integrity.
- The piece notes bipartisan support for the Presidential Records Act since its enactment.
- The article highlights potential consequences if the DOJ opinion stands, including legal challenges.
- The report closes with calls to rescind the opinion and defend the act.
Vote 0