8legs: Crown court

Your Followed Topics

#1 out of 3

crime1d ago

Wolf was found guilty of sexual activity with a child and sentenced to three and a half years in prison.
The defendant claimed a conspiracy involving the court and police but the judge rejected it.
The victim spoke about the trauma from the assault during the judge’s sentencing remarks.
Wolf has a history of 13 prior convictions and mental health issues noted in court.
An indefinite restraining order and a sexual harm prevention order were issued against Wolf.
Wolf will remain on the sex offender register for life.
The judge urged Wolf to accept the victim’s account and move forward with help.
The victim described the crime’s impact in a court impact statement.
The case was heard at Newcastle Crown Court in the United Kingdom.

Vote 0

#2 out of 3

crime11h ago

Natalie Wolf, 47, was sentenced to three-and-a-half years in prison for assaulting a child.
Wolf claimed police and the jury were hypnotised to convict her, but the judge rejected the conspiracy theory.
Judge Gavin Doig dismissed Wolf’s conspiracy claims and said the victim is the real focus of justice.
Wolf will remain on the sex offenders register for life and face a sexual harm prevention order.
The victim said Wolf ‘destroyed’ her childhood and described ongoing harm from the abuse.
Wolf said she would appeal, insisting someone else committed the offence.
The court imposed a life-long sex offenders register requirement for Wolf.
The sentencing included a restraining order against Wolf and a sexual harm prevention order.
The judge stated the real victim must face justice, not the accused.
The case drew attention to the allegations of hypnosis in the courtroom and subsequent appeal.

Vote 0

#3 out of 3100.00%

The judge’s probing questions helped prevent a wrongful conviction in the case.
The article credits meticulous judicial scrutiny for ensuring verdict accuracy.
SUE REID reports on how questioning influenced the case outcome.
The piece raises concerns about trial processes and potential miscarriages of justice.
The article emphasizes fairness and diligent judicial oversight in court.
The report centers on a specific case where the defendant was spared.
The analysis underscores the impact of judge-led inquiry on verdicts.
The coverage highlights the role of media commentary in legal accountability.
The piece notes that the verdict could hinge on how evidence was weighed.
The article presents the judge’s actions as a safeguard against error.

Vote 0

Unlimited Access

Personalized Feed

Full Experience

By continuing, you agree to the Privacy Policy.. You also agree to receive our newsletters, you can opt-out any time.

Create an account and enjoy content that interests you with your personalized feed

Unlimited Access

Personalized Feed

Full Experience

By continuing, you agree to the Privacy Policy.. You also agree to receive our newsletters, you can opt-out any time.