#1
#1 out of 1
politics1d ago
I accompanied my wife to Dignitas. The Lords' filibustering is an insult to all like her who have suffered | Dave Sowry
- Sowry recounts his wife Christy's struggle and how Dignitas shaped their end-of-life decisions, underscoring the bill's intent.
- He argues that the debate has focused on procedure rather than terminally ill people's needs.
- Sowry challenges peers to consider whether perfect palliative care would change their stance on the bill.
- The author condemns the slow pace and breadth of amendments that hinder progress on reform.
- Sowry emphasizes that the bill would provide a safe end-of-life option with safeguards.
- Christy’s diary entry reflects fear about life and acceptance of death within the context of illness.
- The piece calls for honesty from Lords about their positions on moving the bill forward.
- Sowry urges that the bill’s focus should remain on the people it serves, not on procedural battles.
- The piece notes the emotional and ethical stakes for families of terminally ill patients.
Vote 0