#1
#1 out of 1
sports23h ago
This is football without VAR. It’s not perfect, but is it better? No wonder even Howe is torn
- The match revived the debate over VAR, with pundits questioning whether removing it improves officiating.
- Alan Shearer criticized the officiating team for not making clearer calls and cited VAR’s influence on confidence.
- Eddie Howe said VAR affects decision-making, acknowledging both joy of goals and the wish for clarity in rulings.
- The piece argues there is no silver bullet; both VAR and non-VAR approaches have drawbacks.
- The article notes offside and handball calls were at issue, influencing post-match discussions on officiating.
- Howe reflected on the emotional aspect of goals versus the precision of calls in a VAR-influenced era.
- The match is presented as a case study in the broader VAR abolition versus accuracy debate in football.
- The article cites Willock’s disallowed goal and Abraham’s offside finish as examples of contentious decisions.
- Fans’ reactions varied, highlighting a broader tension between spontaneous celebration and technological oversight.
- The piece closes by calling for a balanced approach that reduces delays while preserving fairness and emotion.
Vote 0