8legs: Charles breyer

Your Followed Topics

#1 out of 51.4M est. views20.00%

A federal judge in California ordered an end to Trump’s deployment of National Guard troops to Los Angeles and directed they be returned to the state's Democratic governor.
The ruling says National Guard units are state-controlled and federalization is not automatic during protests against federal authorities.
Breyer rejected the administration’s claim that courts have no power to review a president’s decision to take control of state National Guard units during an emergency.

Vote 40

#2 out of 5

A federal judge blocked the deployment of National Guard troops to Los Angeles over the immigration crackdown.
The court ordered the troops to return to California under Gov. Newsom’s control.
The ruling quotes Founders’ checks and balances to critique the crackdown.
Reuters reported the court paused the order until Monday.
The development adds to multiple legal setbacks for the immigration crackdown.
The incident occurred in the broader context of federal and state authority over immigration enforcement.
The story describes a standoff involving law enforcement and protesters in California.
Reuters covered the judge’s remarks about the order being a 'blank one'.
The article cites Trump as pursuing an immigration crackdown that faced judicial resistance.
The report is attributed to Reuters and originates from Raw Story’s coverage of the decision.

Vote 0

#3 out of 51.5M est. views

A federal judge blocked Trump’s deployment of National Guard troops to Los Angeles and ordered their return to state control.
Judge Breyer ruled the deployment was contrary to law and risked creating a national police force made up of state troops.
The ruling followed months of federally deploying about 5,000 guardsmen in Los Angeles amid protests and violence.
Governor Gavin Newsom had moved to block the federalization effort in California and welcomed the ruling.
The order stayed the injunction through December 15 as the parties consider next steps.
White House officials said they expect to appeal the ruling.
The judge emphasized the founders’ system of checks and balances in the ruling.
The ruling came after Los Angeles protests linked to immigration and anti-ICE demonstrations.
Breyer noted that about 300 Guardsmen remained under federal control pending the outcome of appeals.
The background shows the deployment began in June amid protests and violence in Los Angeles.

Vote 9

#4 out of 5

A federal judge ordered the end of the administration's California National Guard deployment, returning control to Governor Newsom.
The ruling is part of a dispute over federalized troops and immigration enforcement in multiple states.
Glenn Kirschner, a former deputy U.S. attorney, commented on the ruling in a video discussion.
The article notes courts have largely rejected the administration's underlying rationale for deployments.
The story situates the development amid a broader debate on federal versus state authority in 2025.
The piece cites a Substack discussion by Kirschner as part of the coverage.
The report references a broader context of legal challenges to the administration's deployments across states like Oregon and California.
The coverage includes reactions from legal experts about enforcement and constitutional boundaries.
The article emphasizes that legal decisions have limited the administration's cross-state troop deployments.
The report includes contact details and notes on corrections and support for Raw Story.

Vote 0

#5 out of 531.5K est. views

A federal judge ordered the California National Guard to end federalization and return control to Governor Newsom.
Judge Breyer said extensions of initial federalization are not automatically unreviewable by courts.
The ruling argued that federalization of state troops could create a perpetual national police force.
Newsom called the ruling another win for democracy and a setback for unchecked federal power.
The White House disputed the characterization of the federalization as unchecked authority.
About 4,000 National Guard members were federalized earlier in June under the Trump administration.
A separate order extended federalization through February 2, 2026.
The ruling emphasized that federalization must be reviewable, not insulated from courts.
The judge cited concerns about militarized actors roaming urban areas and their local context.
Newsom argued the president diverted troops from public safety operations during the dispute.

Vote 0

Unlimited Access

Personalized Feed

Full Experience

By continuing, you agree to the Privacy Policy.. You also agree to receive our newsletters, you can opt-out any time.

Create an account and enjoy content that interests you with your personalized feed

Unlimited Access

Personalized Feed

Full Experience

By continuing, you agree to the Privacy Policy.. You also agree to receive our newsletters, you can opt-out any time.