#1
#1 out of 127.5K est. views
politics18h ago
Jack Smith says key Jan 6 witness relied on hearsay, lacked firsthand evidence
Foxnews.com and 1 more
- Jack Smith says Cassidy Hutchinson’s key Jan. 6 testimony largely relied on secondhand information, raising questions about its admissibility and weight.
- Smith emphasizes Hutchinson was a secondhand, potentially thirdhand witness, which could limit the impact of her testimony compared to firsthand accounts.
- The deposition notes differing witness perspectives on Jan. 6, including contrasting accounts from Hutchinson and others involved in the events.
- Smith notes there was no final determination on whether Hutchinson would be called as a witness, signaling ongoing evaluation of her role.
- Hutchinson’s live June 2022 testimony is part of a broader scrutiny of Jan. 6 evidence, with questions about completeness and consistency.
- Smith cites that Trump’s alleged demand to go to the Capitol and other claims were part of Hutchinson’s broader, secondhand narrative.
- The new deposition corroborates that several Hutchinson claims originated from others, not from her direct knowledge.
- Hutchinson’s prior committee testimony from June 2022 remains central to discussions about credibility and the impact of her claims.
- Smith’s deposition reflects ongoing evaluation of the reliability and weight of key witnesses in the Trump election interference probe.
- The deposition underscores that some testimonies may be admissible only if they are supported by firsthand evidence or corroboration.
- Overall, Smith’s remarks challenge the reliability of Hutchinson’s most sensational claims while reaffirming the ongoing nature of the Jan. 6 investigation.
Vote 1