8legs: Beryl howell

Your Followed Topics

#1 out of 3

A federal judge blocked warrantless immigration arrests in Washington, D.C., unless warrants are obtained or probable cause of flight risk is shown.
Judge Howell ordered agents to document specific facts supporting pre-arrest probable cause in DC operations.
The ruling cites a substantial likelihood of unlawful policy and practice in warrantless arrests without probable cause.
The decision follows civil liberties and immigrants' rights groups' lawsuit against the Department of Homeland Security.
The ruling echoes similar restrictions in Colorado and California in related cases.
The Immigration and Nationality Act allows warrantless arrests with probable cause or flight risk, per the judge’s interpretation.
ACLU and civil liberties groups led the challenge against DHS policy in federal court.
The judge’s order requires documentation of pre-arrest probable cause in DC operations.
The ruling emphasizes compliance with immigration law and DHS regulations.

Vote 0

#2 out of 3

A D.C. federal judge blocked warrantless civil immigration arrests without showing flight risk.
Judge Beryl Howell described the ruling as shedding light on the Supreme Court’s shadow docket.
The decision references the Supreme Court’s shadow docket and its lack of explanation in key rulings.
Howell distinguished the case from Noem v. Perdomo, noting different contexts and standards.
Howell noted the Perdomo ruling involved stops, not civil arrests, signaling a different legal standard.
The government conceded that Kavanaugh’s concurrence did not bind precedent.
The ruling raises questions about how the Supreme Court would handle similar cases on appeal.
The article emphasizes ongoing uncertainty around shadow docket decisions and enforcement.
The piece connects the ruling to broader legal and political debates over immigration enforcement.
The article notes the shadow docket’s impact on lower court decisions and immigration policy.

Vote 0

#3 out of 3

A federal judge in Washington blocked widespread civil immigration arrests in the capital without warrants or probable cause.
Judge Beryl Howell granted the injunction after a lawsuit by civil liberties and immigrant-rights groups.
The ruling requires officers to document specific facts supporting pre-arrest probable cause for each case.
The decision follows concerns that arrests occurred without proper assessment of flight risk.
The injunction reflects similar limits in other states where courts have blocked racial profiling in immigration operations.
Justice department must provide documentation to plaintiffs' attorneys per the injunction.
The judge noted a substantial likelihood of unlawful policy and practice in warrantless arrests.
The ruling is part of broader litigation involving the ACLU on immigration enforcement practices.
DHS officials defended enforcement as conducted under the Constitution and federal law.
The injunction aligns with other regional cases testing pre-arrest suppression of civil immigration actions.

Vote 0

Unlimited Access

Personalized Feed

Full Experience

By continuing, you agree to the Privacy Policy.. You also agree to receive our newsletters, you can opt-out any time.

Create an account and enjoy content that interests you with your personalized feed

Unlimited Access

Personalized Feed

Full Experience

By continuing, you agree to the Privacy Policy.. You also agree to receive our newsletters, you can opt-out any time.