#1
#1 out of 3
world1d ago
‘Not the deal promised’: Labor’s Ed Husic questions Aukus pact that will deliver secondhand subs
- Australia is wary that the US may not deliver the planned first-hand over of submarines in the early 2030s due to US production rates, prompting scrutiny of timelines as Aukus unfolds.
- Labour figures pressed ministers on contingency plans, asking explicitly about Plan B if the promised deal cannot be fulfilled.
- Marles defended Aukus, arguing that servicing and training would be streamlined for Australian crews once the bespoke SSN Aukus model comes online in 2042.
- The debate highlights internal Labor concerns about sovereign control and whether the new deal will materialise given US dynamics.
- Ed Husic publicly challenged Aukus during Labor caucus, an intervention described as courageous by Kim Carr and signaling a high-profile intra-party clash.
- The 2021 Aukus deal, once endorsed by the opposition and approved by Parliament, remains a flashpoint in current debates over its value and execution.
- Marles noted the Virginia-class submarine delivery pattern, with the first due in 2032 and subsequent units every four years before the Australian-built SSN arrives in 2042.
- Kim Carr, a former Labor minister, commended Husic for breaking ranks on Aukus, reflecting shifting positions within the party.
- National conference discussions are intensifying as broader Labor opposition to Aukus grows, signaling potential policy recalibration.
- Critics cite Port Kembla as a strategic base argument, with some noting it would function as a US navy staging post rather than for Australian submarines.
Vote 0
