Your Followed Topics

Top 4 andy madley News Today

#1
Premier League explains why Arsenal were not given a penalty vs Everton
#1 out of 4
sports9h ago

Premier League explains why Arsenal were not given a penalty vs Everton

  • Arsenal defeated Everton 2-0 at the Emirates, aided by late goals after a defensive error.
  • The match featured a disputed first-half penalty review that was not upheld by VAR.
  • Jamie Redknapp criticized the decision as an ‘absolute disgrace’ on air.
  • Max Dowman became the Premier League’s youngest-ever scorer at 16 years and 73 days.
  • Arsenal moved ten points clear in the Premier League standings after the win.
Vote 0
0
#2
Arsenal given Kai Havertz penalty verdict as VAR explains controversial decision
#2 out of 4
sports9h ago

Arsenal given Kai Havertz penalty verdict as VAR explains controversial decision

  • VAR reviewed Havertz's challenge on Havertz and upheld the referee's decision, ruling the contact minimal.
  • Arsenal failed to win a penalty after Havertz went down following Keane's challenge in the first half.
  • Former pundits argued Havertz should have been awarded a spot-kick, criticizing the VAR decision.
  • Arsenal went on to win 2-0 with late goals from Viktor Gyökeres and Max Dowman at the Emirates.
  • The match was part of Arsenal's attempt to extend their lead at the Premier League summit.
  • Everton created early chances with Kiernan Dewsbury-Hall testing David Raya's reflexes.
  • Redknapp and Sturridge criticized the delay in VAR's decision on the penalty claim.
  • Gunners faced a strong Everton start with woodwork denying Calafiori clearance and Ndiaye misses.
  • David Raya faced several notable saves during the opening period.
  • The article frames the incident within Arsenal's title bid context for the season.
Vote 0
0
#3
Kai Havertz penalty call: Jamie Redknapp brands VAR inaction a disgrace as Arsenal denied spot-kick against Everton
#3 out of 4
sports7h ago

Kai Havertz penalty call: Jamie Redknapp brands VAR inaction a disgrace as Arsenal denied spot-kick against Everton

  • Jamie Redknapp labeled VAR inaction a disgrace after Havertz was denied a penalty against Everton.
  • The incident occurred in the 23rd minute as Havertz challenged Keane in the box.
  • Redknapp argued the penalty should have been overturned, saying the decision was obvious to viewers.
  • Replays suggested Keane may have touched Havertz's left foot during the clash.
  • Arsenal still won 2-0, with two late goals extending their lead at the top of the table.
  • Sky Sports analysts noted the officials' slow review time as a talking point.
  • Arsenal manager Mikel Arteta and staff were seen pleading with officials after the decision.
  • The Premier League match centre labeled the contact as 'minimal' in the official summary.
  • The article emphasizes ongoing debates about VAR consistency in the Premier League.
Vote 0
0
#4
VAR review: Why Arsenal should have had a penalty vs. Everton
#4 out of 4
sports5h ago

VAR review: Why Arsenal should have had a penalty vs. Everton

https://www.espn.com/soccer/story/_/id/48207780/var-review-why-arsenal-had-penalty-vs-evertonhttps://www.football.london/arsenal-fc/news/arsenal-penalty-everton-kai-havertz-33593530
Espn.com and 1 more
  • Arsenal were denied a first-half penalty after Michael Keane appeared to tread on Kai Havertz, with VAR confirming the on-field decision.
  • The article emphasizes the controversy around VAR, noting the contact was deemed minimal and the decision remained unchanged.
  • Jamie Redknapp criticized VAR in coverage by Football London, calling the decision a disgrace after Havertz was denied a spot-kick.
  • The Premier League Match Centre described the contact as 'minimal' between Keane and Havertz, fueling debate over VAR criteria.
  • Arsenal later secured a 2-0 win with Dowman and Gyökeres scoring late goals, extending their competitive edge before the international break.
  • The analysis notes that VAR reviews involve examining replays and the rationale behind referees' decisions on field.
  • The report quotes Andy Davies and other analysts explaining VAR processes and how decisions are reached during matches.
  • Football London highlighted reactions from pundits regarding the HAVERTZ decision, amplifying the controversy surrounding VAR outcomes.
  • The reports connect the Havertz incident to Arsenal's title race context, noting it came before a potential impact on City’s title challenge.
  • The piece references broader VAR debates in Premier League coverage and how fans interpret officiating decisions.
Vote 1
0

Explore Your Interests

Unlimited Access
Personalized Feed
Full Experience
or
By continuing, you agree to the Privacy Policy.. You also agree to receive our newsletters, you can opt-out any time.

Explore Your Interests

Create an account and enjoy content that interests you with your personalized feed

Unlimited Access
Personalized Feed
Full Experience
or
By continuing, you agree to the Privacy Policy.. You also agree to receive our newsletters, you can opt-out any time.

Advertisement

Advertisement