#1
#1 out of 111.8K est. views
politics1d ago
Michael Gove tried to be clever correcting someone's spelling - then Michael Rosen came for Gove's grammar and it was just poetry
- Gove’s spelling critique prompted a reply from Michael Rosen during a Brexit-era debate on grammar in public discourse.
- Rosen questioned whether Gove meant to omit a full stop after a key phrase, engaging in a meta-grammar critique.
- The exchange expanded beyond spelling to discuss England’s education reforms and their emphasis on grammar in the curriculum.
- Dalrymple commented on the broader impact of Brexit on the economy, prompting Rosens’s and Gove’s linguistic exchange.
- Rosen’s commentary on punctuation sparked further discussion about teaching practices in Year 6 and beyond.
- The public debate included multiple voices reacting to grammar policing and political accountability online.
- The exchange illustrates how language criticism can become a broader political moment about reform and standards.
- The Poke article frames the exchange as a modern grammar ‘roast’ between public figures.
- The article mentions the dialogue involving other figures like William Dalrymple and John Simpson in the broader context.
- The piece closes by linking the online exchange to ongoing debates about education quality and public literacy.
Vote 0