#1 out of 1
science7h ago
Three Royal Societies abandon their mission to promote global and universalist science
- Three Royal Societies issued documents endorsing Indigenous knowledge as part of their research frameworks.
- The statements claim Indigenous knowledge is not supplementary but a rigorous, essential way of knowing.
- Critics argue the move could blur scientific standards and legitimize non-scientific claims.
- Anonymous critics accuse the move of advancing 'activist politics' over universal scientific standards.
- Opponents warn Indigenous data ownership could restrict broader scientific collaboration.
- The documents advocate for Indigenous-led priorities and outcomes in research.
- A Kiwi correspondent criticized the stance for potentially endorsing non-scientific approaches.
- The Communiqué emphasises Indigenous leadership in research decisions and data governance.
- The debates reference Matauranga Māori and other Indigenous knowledge systems.
- The discussions include concerns about equity and ethical research practices in higher education.
Vote 0
